Neocloud GPU pricing: what neoclouds are and what they charge
A neocloud is a cloud provider built specifically around GPU compute for AI: instead of a hyperscaler's catalog of hundreds of services, the product is GPU capacity itself, sold as instances, bare metal and clusters at much lower per-GPU-hour rates. We verify prices across 35 neoclouds and the tracked hyperscalers (AWS, Azure and Google Cloud) every day; the table below is today's ranking, not a claim from a blog post.
The hyperscaler median covers the hyperscalers we track (AWS, Azure and Google Cloud) at posted on-demand rates, before negotiated discounts; methodology and caveats on the methodology page.
Neocloud vs hyperscaler pricing, checked 22 October 2026
| Provider | Cheapest H100 (on-demand) | Cheapest A100 (on-demand) | Cheapest overall | Checked | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HyperAI neocloud | $1.80 | – | $0.35 RTX 5090 on-demand | 22 October 2026 | Try → |
| Voltage Park neocloud | $1.99 | – | $1.99 H100 on-demand | 22 October 2026 | Try → |
| TensorDock neocloud | $2.25 | $1.50 | $0.10 RTX A4000 on-demand | 22 October 2026 | Try → |
| Prime Intellect neocloud | $2.43 | – | $2.43 H100 on-demand | 22 October 2026 | Try → |
| Hyperstack neocloud | $2.50 | $1.35 | $0.15 RTX A4000 on-demand | 22 October 2026 | Try → |
| GMI Cloud neocloud | $2.60 | – | $2.60 H100 on-demand | 22 October 2026 | Try → |
| Spheron neocloud | $2.65 | $1.48 | $0.58 RTX 4090 on-demand | 22 October 2026 | Try → |
| Massed Compute neocloud | $2.73 | $1.35 | $0.35 A30 on-demand | 22 October 2026 | Try → |
| RunPod neocloud | $2.89 | $1.79 | $0.24 RTX 2000 Ada secure cloud | 22 October 2026 | Try → |
| OVHcloud neocloud | $2.99 | $3.07 | $0.60 Quadro RTX 5000 on-demand | 22 October 2026 | Try → |
| Thunder Compute neocloud | $3.20 | $1.09 | $0.35 RTX A6000 on-demand | 22 October 2026 | Try → |
| Scaleway neocloud | $3.22 | – | $0.88 L4 on-demand | 22 October 2026 | Try → |
| Lambda neocloud | $3.29 | $1.99 8× min | $0.69 Quadro RTX 6000 on-demand | 22 October 2026 | Try → |
| Latitude.sh neocloud | $3.37 | – | $3.37 H100 on-demand | 22 October 2026 | Try → |
| Jarvislabs neocloud | $3.49 | $0.89 | $0.44 L4 on-demand | 22 October 2026 | Try → |
| Crusoe neocloud | $3.90 | $2.00 | $1.50 L40S on-demand | 22 October 2026 | Try → |
| Daytona neocloud | $3.95 | – | $0.99 RTX 4090 on-demand | 22 October 2026 | Try → |
| Together AI neocloud | $3.99 | – | $3.99 H100 on-demand | 22 October 2026 | Try → |
| DigitalOcean neocloud | $4.41 | – | $0.76 RTX 4000 Ada on-demand | 22 October 2026 | Try → |
| Verda (DataCrunch) neocloud | $4.47 | $1.55 | $0.23 Tesla V100 on-demand | 22 October 2026 | Try → |
| Nebius neocloud | $4.50 | – | $1.35 L40S on-demand | 22 October 2026 | Try → |
| CoreWeave neocloud | $6.16 8× min | $2.70 8× min | $1.25 L40 on-demand | 22 October 2026 | Try → |
| AWS hyperscaler | $6.88 8× min | $2.74 8× min | $0.80 L4 on-demand | 22 October 2026 | Try → |
| Microsoft Azure hyperscaler | $6.98 | $3.40 8× min | $3.40 A100 on-demand | 22 October 2026 | Try → |
| Google Cloud hyperscaler | $9.80 | $2.93 | $0.35 Tesla T4 on-demand | 22 October 2026 | Try → |
| Vultr neocloud | – | $2.40 | $1.67 L40S on-demand | 22 October 2026 | Try → |
| Hot Aisle neocloud | – | – | $2.99 MI300X on-demand | 22 October 2026 | Try → |
| SaladCloud neocloud | – | – | $0.06 RTX 3080 community cloud | 22 October 2026 | Try → |
| Synteq neocloud | – | – | $0.25 RTX PRO 4000 reserved / committed | 22 October 2026 | Try → |
| Koyeb neocloud | – | – | $0.50 RTX 4000 Ada serverless | 22 October 2026 | Try → |
| Cerebrium neocloud | – | – | $0.59 Tesla T4 serverless | 22 October 2026 | Try → |
| Modal neocloud | – | – | $0.59 Tesla T4 serverless | 22 October 2026 | Try → |
| Baseten neocloud | – | – | $0.63 Tesla T4 serverless | 22 October 2026 | Try → |
| Replicate neocloud | – | – | $0.81 Tesla T4 serverless | 22 October 2026 | Try → |
| Lium neocloud | – | – | $1.04 RTX 6000 Ada spot / interruptible | 22 October 2026 | Try → |
| Impossible Cloud neocloud | – | – | $2.63 H100 reserved / committed | last 17 October 2026 | Try → |
| fal neocloud | – | – | $4.00 RTX PRO 6000 serverless | last 20 October 2026 | Try → |
| Fireworks AI neocloud | – | – | $8.00 H100 serverless | 22 October 2026 | Try → |
Cite this data
GPU Rental Prices, "GPU as a service: neocloud pricing (October 2026)", prices checked 22 October 2026, https://gpurentalprices.com/neocloud
Quote it with a link to this page. Downloads of the whole dataset are on Data & API.
Tables rank by price, lowest first. Commercial relationships never affect ordering. How we collect and rank prices.
H100 and A100 columns show each provider's cheapest on-demand (firm) rate per GPU; "–" means the provider has no current on-demand listing for that family. "Cheapest overall" is the provider's lowest current rate of any kind, labeled: serverless platforms (fal, Modal, Replicate, Fireworks) bill per second with no VM access, and community or spot capacity is interruptible. Multi-GPU minimums are badged. Full per-GPU comparisons: H100, A100, all GPUs.
How neoclouds are cheaper, honestly
The gap is real but it is not magic, and it is not all margin. Neoclouds skip the hyperscaler cost structure: no thousand-service catalog to maintain, leaner sales and compliance machinery, and often cheaper power and colocation deals. Many run a single hardware generation hard rather than carrying every instance type ever launched. Some resell capacity from marketplaces or independent datacenters, which pushes prices down further in exchange for more variance in reliability. And posted hyperscaler rates are list prices: large committed-spend customers negotiate them down, which narrows the real-world gap even though the public sticker gap stays wide.
What you give up varies by provider: ecosystem depth (managed databases, queues, IAM integration), the deepest compliance portfolios, and sometimes egress-free data movement you did not know you were paying for elsewhere. The hidden-fees matrix and the enterprise matrix track those differences cell by cell, verified at each provider's own documentation.
Every neocloud we track
All 35 GPU-specialized clouds in the index: where their machines are, how they bill, what they ask before the first machine, and the SLA and support they publish. Each name opens its profile with today's prices.
The providers with the most recorded terms come first. Each cell links to the provider's own page it was read from; "not recorded" means we have not read that term for the provider yet, "not published" that its pages do not state it. Machine locations come from the offers' regions where a price names one, otherwise from the provider's own region or data-centre page. SLA and support terms change: confirm them with the provider before a contract.
Not tracked as neoclouds: Microsoft Azure, AWS and Google Cloud (hyperscalers, kept in the index as the comparison baseline). The full provider list, including editorial profiles, lives at /providers.
FAQ
A neocloud is a cloud provider built specifically around GPU compute for AI workloads, rather than around a general-purpose service catalog. Where a hyperscaler (AWS, Azure, Google Cloud) sells hundreds of services with GPUs as one line item, a neocloud sells GPU capacity as the product: on-demand instances, bare-metal nodes and clusters, usually at much lower per-GPU-hour rates. Examples we track daily include Baseten, Cerebrium, CoreWeave, Crusoe, Daytona, DigitalOcean and 29 others.
Three practical differences. Price: on today's data (22 October 2026) the posted hyperscaler H100 median (AWS, Azure and Google Cloud) runs 2.2x the neocloud median ($6.98/hr vs $3.21/hr). Focus: neoclouds ship GPU instances, clusters and fast interconnect, not a catalog of hundreds of adjacent services. Terms: many neoclouds offer free or cheap egress and per-second or per-minute billing, where hyperscalers meter data leaving the cloud. The trade is ecosystem depth: if your stack already lives on a hyperscaler's managed services, leaving has switching costs.
For an H100, the cheapest on-demand neocloud rate we verified on 22 October 2026 is $1.80/hr at HyperAI. That answer changes as prices move, which is the point of tracking it daily: the table on this page re-ranks every day, and marketplace or spot capacity goes lower still if your job tolerates interruption.
Increasingly yes, with nuance. Several neoclouds run SOC 2 audited datacenters, publish SLAs and carry GDPR paperwork; our enterprise matrix tracks which ones publish what. But the category spans a wide range: a datacenter-grade cloud with published SLAs is a different reliability proposition from a peer-to-peer marketplace of community hosts, even though both are cheaper than a hyperscaler. Interruptible tiers (spot, community) can be reclaimed with little warning by design. For production, match the tier to the workload and read the provider's SLA rather than assuming the category.
We track 35 GPU-specialized clouds daily: Baseten, Cerebrium, CoreWeave, Crusoe, Daytona, DigitalOcean, fal, Fireworks AI, GMI Cloud, Hot Aisle, HyperAI, Hyperstack, Impossible Cloud, Jarvislabs, Koyeb, Lambda, Latitude.sh, Lium, Massed Compute, Modal, Nebius, OVHcloud, Prime Intellect, Replicate, RunPod, SaladCloud, Scaleway, Spheron, Synteq, TensorDock, Thunder Compute, Together AI, Verda (DataCrunch), Voltage Park, Vultr. The label is loose at the edges: it spans large AI clouds like CoreWeave and Lambda, regional clouds like Nebius and DataCrunch, marketplaces like TensorDock, distributed networks like SaladCloud, and serverless GPU platforms like Modal and fal. What unites them is that GPU compute is the product, not a line item.
Related
All live GPU prices · GPU servers and hosting explained · H100 rental prices · A100 rental prices · Serverless GPU pricing · Hidden fees and egress matrix · Enterprise procurement matrix · GPU Rental Price Index (GRPI)