DataCrunch vs Massed Compute
Massed Compute is cheaper on 5 of the 6 GPU configurations both providers list with on-demand pricing, updated 2026-10-06. DataCrunch still wins on one, its best case being the RTX PRO 6000 (unspecified) · 1× minimum at $2.08 vs $2.19. Platform facts come from each provider's documentation.
16.8% cheaper at Massed Compute.
updated 2026-10-06. Price alone does not establish equivalent capacity or performance.
DataCrunch
cheaper on 1 of 6 sharedMassed Compute
cheaper on 5 of 6 sharedPrices are per GPU-hour. Rows match exact GPU variants and published node minimums. When node count is not reported, confirm the required configuration before comparing whole-job costs. These are listed rates, not a guarantee of stock.
Price per GPU, side by side (2026-10-06)
| GPU (on-demand $/hr) | DataCrunch | Massed Compute | Price diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tesla V100 (unspecified) · 1× minimum | $0.198 | not offered | – |
| A30 · 1× minimum | not offered | $0.35 | – |
| RTX A5000 · 1× minimum | not offered | $0.44 | – |
| RTX A6000 · 1× minimum | $0.676 | $0.57 | -$0.106 (-15.7%) Massed Compute |
| RTX 6000 Ada · 1× minimum | $1.20 | $0.79 | -$0.406 (-33.9%) Massed Compute |
| L40 · 1× minimum | not offered | $0.86 | – |
| RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell · 1× minimum | not offered | $0.92 | – |
| L40S · 1× minimum | $1.57 | $0.97 | -$0.604 (-38.4%) Massed Compute |
| A100 SXM 40GB · 1× minimum | $1.32 | not offered | – |
| A100 (unspecified) · 1× minimum | not offered | $1.35 | – |
| A100 SXM 80GB · 1× minimum | $1.82 | $1.38 | -$0.444 (-24.3%) Massed Compute |
| RTX PRO 6000 (unspecified) · 1× minimum | $2.08 | $2.19 | -$0.105 (-4.8%) DataCrunch |
| H100 (unspecified) · 1× minimum | not offered | $2.73 | – |
| H100 NVL · 2× minimum | not offered | $2.92 | – |
| H100 SXM · 1× minimum | $3.77 | $3.14 | -$0.634 (-16.8%) Massed Compute |
| H200 NVL · 1× minimum | not offered | $3.62 | – |
| H200 (SXM) · 1× minimum | $4.92 | not offered | – |
| B200 · 1× minimum | $7.13 | not offered | – |
| B300 · 1× minimum | $8.97 | not offered | – |
| GB300 · 1× minimum | $10.32 | not offered | – |
Lowest recorded on-demand rate per configuration; highlighted = cheaper. Price diff is the absolute and percent saving on the cheaper side (named), relative to the higher price; – means one side has no matching configuration in the collected rates. Spot/marketplace tiers shown on the individual pages.
Tables rank by price, lowest first. Commercial relationships never affect ordering. How we collect and rank prices.
Platform facts
| DataCrunch | Massed Compute | |
|---|---|---|
| Billing increment | not published | per-hour |
| Egress | not published | free |
| Storage /GB-mo | not published | not published |
| Spot offered | not published | not published |
| Reserved offered | sales only | sales only |
| Notebook support | templates | templates |
From each provider's documentation, updated 2026-07-07; sources on the fees matrix and enterprise matrix.
FAQ
Massed Compute is cheaper on 5 of the 6 GPU configurations both providers list, updated 2026-10-06. DataCrunch is cheaper on 1; 0 have equal rates. Compare the configuration you need.
The H100 SXM · 1× minimum: $3.14 per GPU-hour on Massed Compute vs $3.77 on DataCrunch, a difference of $0.634 per hour, updated 2026-10-06.
DataCrunch lists 6 GPU configurations with on-demand pricing that Massed Compute does not: Tesla V100 (unspecified) · 1× minimum, A100 SXM 40GB · 1× minimum, H200 (SXM) · 1× minimum, B200 · 1× minimum, B300 · 1× minimum, GB300 · 1× minimum. Massed Compute lists 8 that DataCrunch does not: A30 · 1× minimum, RTX A5000 · 1× minimum, L40 · 1× minimum, RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell · 1× minimum, A100 (unspecified) · 1× minimum, H100 (unspecified) · 1× minimum and 2 more.
Compare more rental options: the screener · price movers · methodology.