Crusoe vs Hyperstack
Hyperstack is cheaper than Crusoe on all 3 GPU configurations both providers list with on-demand pricing, updated 2026-10-02. The biggest gap is the H100 (unspecified) · node count not reported: $2.50 on Hyperstack vs $3.90 on Crusoe. Platform facts come from each provider's documentation.
Crusoe
cheaper on 0 of 3 sharedHyperstack
cheaper on 3 of 3 sharedPrices are per GPU-hour. Rows match exact GPU variants and published node minimums. When node count is not reported, confirm the required configuration before comparing whole-job costs. These are listed rates, not a guarantee of stock.
Price per GPU, side by side (2026-10-02)
| GPU (on-demand $/hr) | Crusoe | Hyperstack | Price diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| RTX A4000 · node count not reported | not offered | $0.15 | – |
| RTX A6000 · node count not reported | not offered | $0.50 | – |
| L40 · node count not reported | not offered | $1.00 | – |
| A100 (unspecified) · node count not reported | not offered | $1.35 | – |
| L40S · node count not reported | $1.50 | not offered | – |
| A100 SXM 80GB · node count not reported | $2.30 | $1.60 | -$0.70 (-30.4%) Hyperstack |
| RTX PRO 6000 (unspecified) · node count not reported | not offered | $1.85 | – |
| A100 PCIe 80GB · node count not reported | $2.00 | not offered | – |
| H100 (unspecified) · node count not reported | $3.90 | $2.50 | -$1.40 (-35.9%) Hyperstack |
| H100 SXM · node count not reported | not offered | $3.20 | – |
| MI300X · node count not reported | $3.45 | not offered | – |
| H200 (SXM) · node count not reported | $4.29 | $3.99 | -$0.30 (-7.0%) Hyperstack |
| B200 · node count not reported | not offered | $6.00 | – |
| B300 · node count not reported | not offered | $7.40 | – |
Lowest recorded on-demand rate per configuration; highlighted = cheaper. Price diff is the absolute and percent saving on the cheaper side (named), relative to the higher price; – means one side has no matching configuration in the collected rates. Spot/marketplace tiers shown on the individual pages.
Tables rank by price, lowest first. Commercial relationships never affect ordering.How we collect and rank prices.
Platform facts
| Crusoe | Hyperstack | |
|---|---|---|
| Billing increment | per-minute | not published |
| Egress | free | not published |
| Storage /GB-mo | $0.08/GiB/month persistent disk; $0.07/GiB/month shared disk | $0.07/GB/month shared storage |
| Spot offered | not published | yes |
| Reserved offered | sales only | not published |
| Notebook support | templates | templates |
From each provider's documentation, updated 2026-07-07; sources on the fees matrix and enterprise matrix.
FAQ
Hyperstack is cheaper on 3 of the 3 GPU configurations both providers list, updated 2026-10-02. Crusoe is cheaper on 0; 0 have equal rates. Compare the configuration you need.
The H100 (unspecified) · node count not reported: $2.50 per GPU-hour on Hyperstack vs $3.90 on Crusoe, a difference of $1.40 per hour, updated 2026-10-02.
Crusoe lists 3 GPU configurations with on-demand pricing that Hyperstack does not: L40S · node count not reported, A100 PCIe 80GB · node count not reported, MI300X · node count not reported. Hyperstack lists 8 that Crusoe does not: RTX A4000 · node count not reported, RTX A6000 · node count not reported, L40 · node count not reported, A100 (unspecified) · node count not reported, RTX PRO 6000 (unspecified) · node count not reported, H100 SXM · node count not reported and 2 more.
Compare more rental options: the screener · price movers · methodology.