CoreWeave vs Hyperstack
Hyperstack is cheaper than CoreWeave on all 5 GPU configurations both providers list with on-demand pricing, updated 2026-10-12. The biggest gap is the H100: $2.50 on Hyperstack vs $6.16 on CoreWeave. Platform facts come from each provider's documentation.
59.4% cheaper at Hyperstack.
updated 2026-10-12. Price alone does not establish equivalent capacity or performance.
CoreWeave
cheaper on 0 of 5 sharedHyperstack
cheaper on 5 of 5 sharedHyperstack does not state node sizes.
Prices are per GPU-hour for the same GPU variant. Published node sizes are shown with their rates; whole-node costs differ when node sizes differ. These are listed rates, not a guarantee of stock.
Price per GPU, side by side (2026-10-12)
| GPU (on-demand $/hr) | CoreWeave | Hyperstack | Price diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| L40 | $1.258-GPU node | $1.00 | -$0.25 (-20.0%) Hyperstack |
| A100 | $2.708-GPU node | $1.35 | -$1.35 (-50.0%) Hyperstack |
| H100 | $6.168-GPU node | $2.50 | -$3.66 (-59.4%) Hyperstack |
| H200 (SXM) | $6.308-GPU node | $3.99 | -$2.31 (-36.7%) Hyperstack |
| B200 | $8.608-GPU node | $6.00 | -$2.60 (-30.2%) Hyperstack |
Cheapest on-demand rate; the cheaper one is highlighted. Price diff is the per-GPU-hour saving on the cheaper side (named), relative to the higher price; – means one side has no comparable recorded rate in our data, which is not proof that it does not offer the GPU. Spot/marketplace tiers shown on the individual pages.
Only CoreWeave lists these GPUs in our data
| GPU | CoreWeave, $/GPU-hour |
|---|---|
| L40S | $2.258-GPU node |
| RTX PRO 6000 Server | $2.508-GPU node |
| GH200 | $6.50single GPU |
Only Hyperstack lists these GPUs in our data
| GPU | Hyperstack, $/GPU-hour |
|---|---|
| RTX A4000 | $0.15 |
| RTX A6000 | $0.50 |
| A100 SXM 80GB | $1.60 |
| RTX PRO 6000 | $1.85 |
| H100 SXM | $3.20 |
| B300 | $7.40 |
Platform facts
| CoreWeave | Hyperstack | |
|---|---|---|
| Billing increment | not published | not published |
| Egress | free | not published |
| Storage /GB-mo | $0.070/GB/month distributed file storage; $0.06/GB/month hot object storage | $0.07/GB/month shared storage |
| Spot offered | not published | yes |
| Reserved offered | sales only | not published |
| Notebook support | templates | templates |
From each provider's documentation, updated 2026-07-07; sources on the fees matrix and enterprise matrix.
FAQ
Hyperstack is cheaper on 5 of the 5 GPU configurations both providers list, updated 2026-10-12. CoreWeave is cheaper on 0; 0 have equal rates. Compare the configuration you need.
The H100: $2.50 per GPU-hour on Hyperstack vs $6.16 on CoreWeave, a difference of $3.66 per hour, updated 2026-10-12.
We have an on-demand rate for 3 GPUs at CoreWeave with no comparable recorded rate at Hyperstack: L40S, RTX PRO 6000 Server, GH200. At Hyperstack, 6 with no comparable recorded rate at CoreWeave: RTX A4000, RTX A6000, A100 SXM 80GB, RTX PRO 6000, H100 SXM, B300. A missing rate means our data has none, not that the provider cannot supply it.
Compare more rental options: the screener · price movers · methodology.