CoreWeave vs DataCrunch
DataCrunch is cheaper than CoreWeave on all 3 GPU configurations both providers list with on-demand pricing, updated 2026-10-11. The biggest gap is the H200 (SXM): $5.23 on DataCrunch vs $6.30 on CoreWeave. Platform facts come from each provider's documentation.
17.1% cheaper at DataCrunch.
updated 2026-10-11. Price alone does not establish equivalent capacity or performance.
CoreWeave
cheaper on 0 of 3 sharedDataCrunch
cheaper on 3 of 3 sharedPrices are per GPU-hour for the same GPU variant. Published node sizes are shown with their rates; whole-node costs differ when node sizes differ. These are listed rates, not a guarantee of stock.
Price per GPU, side by side (2026-10-11)
| GPU (on-demand $/hr) | CoreWeave | DataCrunch | Price diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| L40S | $2.258-GPU node | $1.65single GPU | -$0.596 (-26.5%) DataCrunch |
| H200 (SXM) | $6.308-GPU node | $5.23single GPU | -$1.08 (-17.1%) DataCrunch |
| B200 | $8.608-GPU node | $7.56single GPU | -$1.04 (-12.0%) DataCrunch |
Cheapest on-demand rate; the cheaper one is highlighted. Price diff is the per-GPU-hour saving on the cheaper side (named), relative to the higher price; – means one side has no comparable recorded rate in our data, which is not proof that it does not offer the GPU. Spot/marketplace tiers shown on the individual pages.
Only CoreWeave lists these GPUs in our data
| GPU | CoreWeave, $/GPU-hour |
|---|---|
| L40 | $1.258-GPU node |
| RTX PRO 6000 Server | $2.508-GPU node |
| A100 | $2.708-GPU node |
| H100 | $6.168-GPU node |
| GH200 | $6.50single GPU |
Only DataCrunch lists these GPUs in our data
| GPU | DataCrunch, $/GPU-hour |
|---|---|
| Tesla V100 | $0.21single GPU |
| RTX A6000 | $0.706single GPU |
| RTX 6000 Ada | $1.25single GPU |
| A100 SXM 40GB | $1.40single GPU |
| A100 SXM 80GB | $1.93single GPU |
| RTX PRO 6000 | $2.21single GPU |
| H100 SXM | $4.01single GPU |
| B300 | $9.52single GPU |
| GB300 | $10.95single GPU |
Platform facts
| CoreWeave | DataCrunch | |
|---|---|---|
| Billing increment | not published | not published |
| Egress | free | not published |
| Storage /GB-mo | $0.070/GB/month distributed file storage; $0.06/GB/month hot object storage | not published |
| Spot offered | not published | not published |
| Reserved offered | sales only | sales only |
| Notebook support | templates | templates |
From each provider's documentation, updated 2026-07-07; sources on the fees matrix and enterprise matrix.
FAQ
DataCrunch is cheaper on 3 of the 3 GPU configurations both providers list, updated 2026-10-11. CoreWeave is cheaper on 0; 0 have equal rates. Compare the configuration you need.
The H200 (SXM): $5.23 per GPU-hour on DataCrunch vs $6.30 on CoreWeave, a difference of $1.08 per hour, updated 2026-10-11.
We have an on-demand rate for 5 GPUs at CoreWeave with no comparable recorded rate at DataCrunch: L40, RTX PRO 6000 Server, A100, H100, GH200. At DataCrunch, 9 with no comparable recorded rate at CoreWeave: Tesla V100, RTX A6000, RTX 6000 Ada, A100 SXM 40GB, A100 SXM 80GB, RTX PRO 6000 and 3 more. A missing rate means our data has none, not that the provider cannot supply it.
Compare more rental options: the screener · price movers · methodology.