CoreWeave vs Crusoe
Crusoe is cheaper than CoreWeave on all 3 GPU configurations both providers list with on-demand pricing, updated 2026-10-11. The biggest gap is the H100: $3.90 on Crusoe vs $6.16 on CoreWeave. Platform facts come from each provider's documentation.
36.6% cheaper at Crusoe.
updated 2026-10-11. Price alone does not establish equivalent capacity or performance.
CoreWeave
cheaper on 0 of 3 sharedCrusoe
cheaper on 3 of 3 sharedCrusoe does not state node sizes.
Prices are per GPU-hour for the same GPU variant. Published node sizes are shown with their rates; whole-node costs differ when node sizes differ. These are listed rates, not a guarantee of stock.
Price per GPU, side by side (2026-10-11)
| GPU (on-demand $/hr) | CoreWeave | Crusoe | Price diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| L40S | $2.258-GPU node | $1.50 | -$0.75 (-33.3%) Crusoe |
| H100 | $6.168-GPU node | $3.90 | -$2.26 (-36.6%) Crusoe |
| H200 (SXM) | $6.308-GPU node | $4.29 | -$2.01 (-32.0%) Crusoe |
Cheapest on-demand rate; the cheaper one is highlighted. Price diff is the per-GPU-hour saving on the cheaper side (named), relative to the higher price; – means one side has no comparable recorded rate in our data, which is not proof that it does not offer the GPU. Spot/marketplace tiers shown on the individual pages.
Only CoreWeave lists these GPUs in our data
| GPU | CoreWeave, $/GPU-hour |
|---|---|
| L40 | $1.258-GPU node |
| RTX PRO 6000 Server | $2.508-GPU node |
| A100 | $2.708-GPU node |
| GH200 | $6.50single GPU |
| B200 | $8.608-GPU node |
Only Crusoe lists these GPUs in our data
| GPU | Crusoe, $/GPU-hour |
|---|---|
| A100 PCIe 80GB | $2.00 |
| A100 SXM 80GB | $2.30 |
| MI300X | $3.45 |
Platform facts
| CoreWeave | Crusoe | |
|---|---|---|
| Billing increment | not published | per-minute |
| Egress | free | free |
| Storage /GB-mo | $0.070/GB/month distributed file storage; $0.06/GB/month hot object storage | $0.08/GiB/month persistent disk; $0.07/GiB/month shared disk |
| Spot offered | not published | not published |
| Reserved offered | sales only | sales only |
| Notebook support | templates | templates |
From each provider's documentation, updated 2026-07-07; sources on the fees matrix and enterprise matrix.
FAQ
Crusoe is cheaper on 3 of the 3 GPU configurations both providers list, updated 2026-10-11. CoreWeave is cheaper on 0; 0 have equal rates. Compare the configuration you need.
The H100: $3.90 per GPU-hour on Crusoe vs $6.16 on CoreWeave, a difference of $2.26 per hour, updated 2026-10-11.
We have an on-demand rate for 5 GPUs at CoreWeave with no comparable recorded rate at Crusoe: L40, RTX PRO 6000 Server, A100, GH200, B200. At Crusoe, 3 with no comparable recorded rate at CoreWeave: A100 PCIe 80GB, A100 SXM 80GB, MI300X. A missing rate means our data has none, not that the provider cannot supply it.
Compare more rental options: the screener · price movers · methodology.