AWS vs Hyperstack
Hyperstack is cheaper than AWS on all 3 GPU configurations both providers list with on-demand pricing, updated 2026-10-12. The biggest gap is the H200 (SXM): $3.99 on Hyperstack vs $7.91 on AWS. Platform facts come from each provider's documentation.
49.6% cheaper at Hyperstack.
updated 2026-10-12. Price alone does not establish equivalent capacity or performance.
Hyperstack
cheaper on 3 of 3 sharedHyperstack does not state node sizes.
Prices are per GPU-hour for the same GPU variant. Published node sizes are shown with their rates; whole-node costs differ when node sizes differ. These are listed rates, not a guarantee of stock.
Price per GPU, side by side (2026-10-12)
| GPU (on-demand $/hr) | AWS | Hyperstack | Price diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| A100 SXM 80GB | $3.438-GPU node | $1.60 | -$1.83 (-53.4%) Hyperstack |
| H100 SXM | $6.888-GPU node | $3.20 | -$3.68 (-53.5%) Hyperstack |
| H200 (SXM) | $7.918-GPU node | $3.99 | -$3.92 (-49.6%) Hyperstack |
Cheapest on-demand rate; the cheaper one is highlighted. Price diff is the per-GPU-hour saving on the cheaper side (named), relative to the higher price; – means one side has no comparable recorded rate in our data, which is not proof that it does not offer the GPU. Spot/marketplace tiers shown on the individual pages.
Only AWS lists these GPUs in our data
| GPU | AWS, $/GPU-hour |
|---|---|
| L4 | $0.805single GPU |
| L40S | $1.86single GPU |
| A100 SXM 40GB | $2.748-GPU node |
Only Hyperstack lists these GPUs in our data
| GPU | Hyperstack, $/GPU-hour |
|---|---|
| RTX A4000 | $0.15 |
| RTX A6000 | $0.50 |
| L40 | $1.00 |
| A100 | $1.35 |
| RTX PRO 6000 | $1.85 |
| H100 | $2.50 |
| B200 | $6.00 |
| B300 | $7.40 |
Platform facts
| AWS | Hyperstack | |
|---|---|---|
| Billing increment | per-second | not published |
| Egress | $0.09/GB first 10TB after free tier | not published |
| Storage /GB-mo | $0.08/GB-month gp3 example region | $0.07/GB/month shared storage |
| Spot offered | yes | yes |
| Reserved offered | yes self-serve | not published |
| Notebook support | one-click Jupyter | templates |
From each provider's documentation, updated 2026-07-07; sources on the fees matrix and enterprise matrix.
FAQ
Hyperstack is cheaper on 3 of the 3 GPU configurations both providers list, updated 2026-10-12. AWS is cheaper on 0; 0 have equal rates. Compare the configuration you need.
The H200 (SXM): $3.99 per GPU-hour on Hyperstack vs $7.91 on AWS, a difference of $3.92 per hour, updated 2026-10-12.
We have an on-demand rate for 3 GPUs at AWS with no comparable recorded rate at Hyperstack: L4, L40S, A100 SXM 40GB. At Hyperstack, 8 with no comparable recorded rate at AWS: RTX A4000, RTX A6000, L40, A100, RTX PRO 6000, H100 and 2 more. A missing rate means our data has none, not that the provider cannot supply it.
Compare more rental options: the screener · price movers · methodology.