Hyperstack vs Thunder Compute
Thunder Compute is cheaper on 3 of the 4 GPU configurations both providers list with on-demand pricing, updated 2026-10-02. The biggest gap is the A100 (unspecified) · node count not reported: $1.09 on Thunder Compute vs $1.35 on Hyperstack. Platform facts come from each provider's documentation.
Hyperstack
cheaper on 0 of 4 sharedThunder Compute
cheaper on 3 of 4 sharedPrices are per GPU-hour. Rows match exact GPU variants and published node minimums. When node count is not reported, confirm the required configuration before comparing whole-job costs. These are listed rates, not a guarantee of stock.
Price per GPU, side by side (2026-10-02)
| GPU (on-demand $/hr) | Hyperstack | Thunder Compute | Price diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| RTX A4000 · node count not reported | $0.15 | not offered | – |
| RTX A6000 · node count not reported | $0.50 | $0.35 | -$0.15 (-30.0%) Thunder Compute |
| L40 · node count not reported | $1.00 | $0.79 | -$0.21 (-21.0%) Thunder Compute |
| A100 (unspecified) · node count not reported | $1.35 | $1.09 | -$0.26 (-19.3%) Thunder Compute |
| A100 SXM 80GB · node count not reported | $1.60 | not offered | – |
| RTX PRO 6000 (unspecified) · node count not reported | $1.85 | not offered | – |
| H100 (unspecified) · node count not reported | $2.50 | not offered | – |
| H100 SXM · node count not reported | $3.20 | $3.20 | $0.00 |
| H200 (SXM) · node count not reported | $3.99 | not offered | – |
| B200 · node count not reported | $6.00 | not offered | – |
| B300 · node count not reported | $7.40 | not offered | – |
Lowest recorded on-demand rate per configuration; highlighted = cheaper. Price diff is the absolute and percent saving on the cheaper side (named), relative to the higher price; – means one side has no matching configuration in the collected rates. Spot/marketplace tiers shown on the individual pages.
Tables rank by price, lowest first. Commercial relationships never affect ordering.How we collect and rank prices.
Platform facts
| Hyperstack | Thunder Compute | |
|---|---|---|
| Billing increment | not published | not recorded |
| Egress | not published | not recorded |
| Storage /GB-mo | $0.07/GB/month shared storage | not recorded |
| Spot offered | yes | not recorded |
| Reserved offered | not published | not recorded |
| Notebook support | templates | not recorded |
From each provider's documentation, updated 2026-07-07; sources on the fees matrix and enterprise matrix.
FAQ
Thunder Compute is cheaper on 3 of the 4 GPU configurations both providers list, updated 2026-10-02. Hyperstack is cheaper on 0; 1 have equal rates. Compare the configuration you need.
The A100 (unspecified) · node count not reported: $1.09 per GPU-hour on Thunder Compute vs $1.35 on Hyperstack, a difference of $0.26 per hour, updated 2026-10-02.
Hyperstack lists 7 GPU configurations with on-demand pricing that Thunder Compute does not: RTX A4000 · node count not reported, A100 SXM 80GB · node count not reported, RTX PRO 6000 (unspecified) · node count not reported, H100 (unspecified) · node count not reported, H200 (SXM) · node count not reported, B200 · node count not reported and 1 more. Every recorded Thunder Compute configuration also has a listed rate at Hyperstack.
Compare more rental options: the screener · price movers · methodology.