CoreWeave vs TensorDock
TensorDock is cheaper than CoreWeave on all 1 GPU configurations both providers list with on-demand pricing, checked 13 October 2026. The biggest gap is the L40: $0.95 on TensorDock vs $1.25 on CoreWeave. Platform facts come from each provider's documentation.
24.0% cheaper at TensorDock.
checked 13 October 2026. Price alone does not establish equivalent capacity or performance.
CoreWeave
cheaper on 0 of 1 sharedTensorDock
cheaper on 1 of 1 sharedTensorDock does not state node sizes.
Prices are per GPU-hour for the same GPU variant. Published node sizes are shown with their rates; whole-node costs differ when node sizes differ. These are listed rates, not a guarantee of stock.
Price per GPU, side by side (13 October 2026)
| GPU (on-demand $/hr) | CoreWeave | TensorDock | Price diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| L40 | $1.258-GPU node | $0.95 | -$0.30 (-24.0%) TensorDock |
Cheapest on-demand rate; the cheaper one is highlighted. Price diff is the per-GPU-hour saving on the cheaper side (named), relative to the higher price; – means one side has no comparable recorded rate in our data, which is not proof that it does not offer the GPU. Spot/marketplace tiers shown on the individual pages.
Only CoreWeave lists these GPUs in our data
| GPU | CoreWeave, $/GPU-hour |
|---|---|
| L40S | $2.258-GPU node |
| RTX PRO 6000 Server | $2.508-GPU node |
| A100 | $2.708-GPU node |
| H100 | $6.168-GPU node |
| H200 (SXM) | $6.308-GPU node |
| GH200 | $6.50single GPU |
| B200 | $8.608-GPU node |
Only TensorDock lists these GPUs in our data
| GPU | TensorDock, $/GPU-hour |
|---|---|
| RTX A4000 | $0.10 |
| Tesla V100 SXM2 | $0.17 |
| RTX 3090 | $0.20 |
| RTX 4090 | $0.35 |
| RTX A6000 | $0.45 |
| RTX 6000 Ada | $0.75 |
| A100 PCIe 80GB | $1.50 |
| A100 SXM 80GB | $1.80 |
| H100 SXM | $2.25 |
Platform facts
| CoreWeave | TensorDock | |
|---|---|---|
| Billing increment | not published | not recorded |
| Egress | free | not recorded |
| Storage /GB-mo | $0.070/GB/month distributed file storage; $0.06/GB/month hot object storage | not recorded |
| Spot offered | not published | not recorded |
| Reserved offered | sales only | not recorded |
| Notebook support | templates | not recorded |
From each provider's documentation, checked on 7 July 2026 unless a later date is shown; sources on the fees matrix and enterprise matrix.
FAQ
TensorDock is cheaper on 1 of the 1 GPU configurations both providers list, checked 13 October 2026. CoreWeave is cheaper on 0; 0 have equal rates. Compare the configuration you need.
The L40: $0.95 per GPU-hour on TensorDock vs $1.25 on CoreWeave, a difference of $0.30 per hour, checked 13 October 2026.
We have an on-demand rate for 7 GPUs at CoreWeave with no comparable recorded rate at TensorDock: L40S, RTX PRO 6000 Server, A100, H100, H200 (SXM), GH200 and 1 more. At TensorDock, 9 with no comparable recorded rate at CoreWeave: RTX A4000, Tesla V100 SXM2, RTX 3090, RTX 4090, RTX A6000, RTX 6000 Ada and 3 more. A missing rate means our data has none, not that the provider cannot supply it.
Compare more rental options: the screener · price movers · methodology.