CoreWeave vs Nebius
Nebius is cheaper than CoreWeave on all 4 GPU configurations both providers list with on-demand pricing, updated 2026-10-11. The biggest gap is the H100: $4.50 on Nebius vs $6.16 on CoreWeave. Platform facts come from each provider's documentation.
26.9% cheaper at Nebius.
updated 2026-10-11. Price alone does not establish equivalent capacity or performance.
CoreWeave
cheaper on 0 of 4 sharedNebius
cheaper on 4 of 4 sharedNebius does not state node sizes.
Prices are per GPU-hour for the same GPU variant. Published node sizes are shown with their rates; whole-node costs differ when node sizes differ. These are listed rates, not a guarantee of stock.
Price per GPU, side by side (2026-10-11)
| GPU (on-demand $/hr) | CoreWeave | Nebius | Price diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| L40S | $2.258-GPU node | $1.35 | -$0.90 (-40.0%) Nebius |
| H100 | $6.168-GPU node | $4.50 | -$1.66 (-26.9%) Nebius |
| H200 (SXM) | $6.308-GPU node | $5.40 | -$0.905 (-14.4%) Nebius |
| B200 | $8.608-GPU node | $8.50 | -$0.10 (-1.2%) Nebius |
Cheapest on-demand rate; the cheaper one is highlighted. Price diff is the per-GPU-hour saving on the cheaper side (named), relative to the higher price; – means one side has no comparable recorded rate in our data, which is not proof that it does not offer the GPU. Spot/marketplace tiers shown on the individual pages.
Only CoreWeave lists these GPUs in our data
| GPU | CoreWeave, $/GPU-hour |
|---|---|
| L40 | $1.258-GPU node |
| RTX PRO 6000 Server | $2.508-GPU node |
| A100 | $2.708-GPU node |
| GH200 | $6.50single GPU |
Only Nebius lists these GPUs in our data
| GPU | Nebius, $/GPU-hour |
|---|---|
| RTX PRO 6000 | $1.80 |
| B300 | $9.50 |
Platform facts
| CoreWeave | Nebius | |
|---|---|---|
| Billing increment | not published | per-second |
| Egress | free | $0.015/GiB Standard Object Storage egress; VM network egress not published |
| Storage /GB-mo | $0.070/GB/month distributed file storage; $0.06/GB/month hot object storage | $0.0530/GiB/month block volumes without replication |
| Spot offered | not published | yes |
| Reserved offered | sales only | sales only |
| Notebook support | templates | one-click Jupyter |
From each provider's documentation, updated 2026-07-07; sources on the fees matrix and enterprise matrix.
FAQ
Nebius is cheaper on 4 of the 4 GPU configurations both providers list, updated 2026-10-11. CoreWeave is cheaper on 0; 0 have equal rates. Compare the configuration you need.
The H100: $4.50 per GPU-hour on Nebius vs $6.16 on CoreWeave, a difference of $1.66 per hour, updated 2026-10-11.
We have an on-demand rate for 4 GPUs at CoreWeave with no comparable recorded rate at Nebius: L40, RTX PRO 6000 Server, A100, GH200. At Nebius, 2 with no comparable recorded rate at CoreWeave: RTX PRO 6000, B300. A missing rate means our data has none, not that the provider cannot supply it.
Compare more rental options: the screener · price movers · methodology.